Evaluation
ROLE OF IOM CENTRAL EVALUATION
Contributes actively to the oversight, accountability, transparency, strategic guidance and organizational leadership, and learning of the Organization
Sets the norms and standards for Evaluation at IOM, and prepares relevant institutional policies and guidance
Provides technical assistance to IOM departments and offices for evaluation and monitoring
Contributes to the functioning of decentralized evaluation systems and guarantees their quality
Conducts central and corporate evaluations as well as specific assessments and reviews
Policy and Strategy
Evaluation is a core function of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), which is tasked to promote it, set the relevant policies and guidelines for the entire organization, and conduct corporate evaluations.
The Charter of the Central Evaluation Unit (EVA) sets out the mandate, authority and accountabilities of EVA, which is the designated entity in charge of evaluation in IOM. It sets out the principles and procedures of IOM evaluation and for engagement with IOM departments and offices that are subject to evaluations.
Two Levels of Evaluation
CENTRALIZED
Conducted and managed by the Central Evaluation Office
DECENTRALIZED
Managed by country, regional or other headquarter-based units

MONITORING AND EVALUATION NEXUS
While monitoring is one of the key instruments of results-based management (RBM), evaluation looks at monitoring and RBM with a critical eye to enquire whether, why and how results were achieved. Evaluation also provides information not readily available from monitoring, such as in-depth consideration of attribution of impact, relevance, efficiency, outcome and sustainability, as well as recommendations for management action.
Guiding Documents and Technical References
IOM Evaluation Charter IN/291 (2023)
The Charter of the Central Evaluation Unit (EVA) sets out the mandate, authority and accountabilities of EVA, which is the designated entity in charge of evaluation in IOM. It sets out the principles and procedures of IOM evaluation and for engagement with IOM departments and offices that are subject to evaluations.
Evaluation Policy
Evaluation is a core function of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), which is tasked to promote it, set the relevant policies and guidelines for the entire Organization and conduct corporate evaluations.
Biennial Evaluation Plan 2023-2024
The IOM Biennial Evaluation Plan 2023-2024 includes a selection of central evaluations that will be conducted by the IOM Central Evaluation Unit of the Department of Strategic Planning and Organizational Performance (EVA/DPP).
UNEG/OECD Peer Review of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Evaluation Function
The Peer Review of IOM’s evaluation function was conducted under the provisions contained in the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Framework for Professional Peer Reviews of the Evaluation Function of UN organizations and the OECD DAC. It is the first Peer Review of IOM’s evaluation function and it was conducted at the request of IOM.
The IOM Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines contribute to strengthening the capacities at IOM by providing more detailed and in-depth support for the systematic monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of any IOM intervention, including projects/programmes and policies, as well as strategies at national, regional and global levels.
Guidance for Evaluators
This short guidance provides Evaluators with information about the conduct of evaluation at IOM and will ensure a transparent process leading to quality deliverables.
Guidance for Evaluation Managers
This Guidance is part of a common set of guidance notes issued by the Central Evaluation function of IOM as part of the OIG 2021-2023 Strategy for the management of evaluation and monitoring functions and supports the implementation of the IOM Evaluation Policy (September 2018). Guidance notes are technical documents that set IOM standards and provide explanations on the processes and methodologies used for conducting both monitoring as well as evaluation (M&E) work at IOM.
Guidance on the Use of Evaluation and Follow-Up of Recommendations
This document outlines the potential uses of evaluations and provides guidance on how to ensure the use of evaluations and follow-up of evaluation recommendations. In particular, all IOM evaluations (internal and external) should include a management response and action plan for the implementation and follow-up of their recommendations.
The updated Norms and Standards were discussed and unanimously adopted at the April 2016 UNEG Annual General Meeting in Geneva. The 2016 Norms and Standards are interrelated and mutually reinforcing. The ten general norms should be upheld in the conduct of any evaluation; the four institutional norms should be reflected in the management and governance of evaluation functions.
UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation
The ethical principles outlined below are firmly grounded in, and build on, the 2016 UNEG Norms and Standards for Evaluation that provide the agreed normative principles to be upheld in the conduct, management and governance of evaluation.
UNEG Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluations
This Guidance has been developed in response to the results of a mapping study conducted to determine the level of integration of HR & GE approaches in evaluations carried out in UN agencies, funds, programmes and training institutions (hereafter referred to as ‘UN entities’).
UNEG Impact Evaluation in UN Agency Evaluation Systems: Guidance on Selection, Planning and Management
This Guidance Note, used in conjunction with many other recent resources on impact evaluation, provides a sound starting point for UN evaluation bodies wishing to commence conducting impact evaluations.